Richmond Lattimore vs W. H. D. Rouse Iliad Translation Comparison

Years: 1951 and 2007

Lattimore's translation of the Iliad is renowned for its poetic and lyrical quality, faithfully capturing the essence of Homer's original work, while Rouse's translation focuses more on accessibility and readability, making it a good introduction for a modern reader.

Passage comparison

Richmond Lattimore

Sing, goddess, the anger of Peleus' son Achilleus
and its devastation, which puts pains thousandfold upon the Achaians,
hurled in their multitudes to the house of Hades strong souls
of heroes, but gave their bodies to be the delicate feasting
of dogs, of all birds, and the will of Zeus was accomplished
since that time when first there stood in division of conflict
Atreus' son the lord of men and brilliant Achilleus.

W. H. D. Rouse

An angry man—There is my story: The bitter rancour of Achillês, prince of the house of Peleus, which brought a thousand troubles upon the Achaian host. Many a strong soul it sent down to Hadês, and left the heroes themselves a prey to dogs and carrion birds, while the will of God moved on to fulfilment.
It began first of all with a quarrel between my lord King Agamemnon of Atreus' line and the Prince Achillês.

Details

Go Home - All Comparions